How sophisticated is Brazilian agribusiness? An exploratory analysis based on productivity and complexity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26767/colquio.22.3778Resumo
The significant growth of Brazilian agribusiness has contributed to spreading a collective perception that Brazil produces with high levels of efficiency and has a competitive advantage in a wide range of sophisticated products. But is this image an accurate representation of Brazilian agribusiness in an international context? To answer this question and to analyze the sources of agricultural productivity differences between countries, was adopted the economic complexity approach. The results indicated that, despite all the scale, the complexity of Brazilian agribusiness products is at an intermediate stage, far from the countries with the highest value added per worker in agriculture. In addition, as suggested by theory, we found a positive association between labor productivity in agriculture and the agribusiness complexity up to the year 2012, when the signal reverses—possibly owing to the greater importance of south-south agricultural flows and the protectionist movements in the post international crisis period. In conclusion, even though Brazilian agro can be qualified as pop, it does not seem appropriate to define it as high tech, especially if the reference is to the labor productivity and product complexity of leading countries. The construction of complexity in agribusiness goes beyond the boundaries of traditional agricultural development policies. Industrial policies aimed at building complexity need to be comprehensive enough to identify key products and the fundamental capabilities for their successful market performance. This applies to products and industrial sectors as well as to agribusiness.
Referências
ABRAMOVITZ, M. Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. Journal of Economic History, v. 46, p. 386–406, 1986.
ADAMOPOULOS, T.; RESTUCCIA, D. The size distribution of farms and international productivity differences. American Economic Review, v. 104, n. 6, p. 1667–1697, 2014.
ASHEIM, B. T.; BOSCHMA, R.; COOKE, P. Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, v. 45, n. 7, p. 893–904, 2011.
AVILA, A.; EVENSON, R. Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: The role of technology capital. In: PINGALI, P.; EVENSON, R. (Eds.). Handbook of Agricultural Economics. v. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2010. p. 3769–3822.
BISANG, R.; ANLLÓ, G.; CAMPI, M. Claves para repensar el agro argentino. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 2013.
BISANG, R.; ANLLÓ, G.; CAMPI, M. Políticas tecnológicas para la innovación: la producción agrícola argentina. Santiago de Chile: CIEPLAN, 2015.
BOSCHMA, R. Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, v. 51, n. 3, p. 351–364, 2017.
BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura e Pecuária. Brazilian agribusiness set a record for exports in April, reaching 15.24 billion. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/en/news/brazilian-agribusiness-set-a-record-for-exports-in-april-reaching-15-24-billion. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2025.
BRESCHI, S.; MALERBA, F. Sectoral systems of innovation: Technological regimes, Schumpeterian dynamics and spatial boundaries. In: EDQUIST, C. (Ed.). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter, 1997.
CHADDAD, F. The Economics and Organization of Brazilian Agriculture: Recent Evolution and Productivity Gains. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 2015.
CIMOLI, M.; PORCILE, G.; ROVIRA, S. Structural change and the BOP constraint: Why did Latin America fail to converge? Cambridge Journal of Economics, v. 34, p. 389–411, 2010. doi:10.1093/cje/ben060.
COMEX DO BRASIL. Agro exportou US$ 166 bilhões em 2023, 49% das vendas totais do Brasil no exterior. Disponível em: https://comexdobrasil.com/agro-exportou-us-166-bilhoes-em-2023-49-das-vendas-totais-do-brasil-no-exterior/. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2025.
CRAIG, B.; PARDEY, P.; ROSEBLOOM, J. International productivity patterns: Accounting for input quality, infrastructure, and research. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, v. 79, p. 1064–1076, 1997.
DABAT, G. Revoluciones tecnológicas en la producción de commodities agrícolas: del fordismo a la revolución informática ¿Y después? In: DABAT, G.; PAZ, S. (Eds.). Commodities agrícolas: cambio técnico y precios. Quilmes: Colección Economía y Sociedad Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 2014.
DONOVAN, K. Agricultural Risk, Intermediate Inputs, and Cross-country Productivity Differences. Disponível em: http://kevindonovan.weebly.com/uploads/8/7/0/2/8702484/donovan_riskprod_webcurrent.pdf. Acesso em: 12 set. 2019.
DOSI, G. Perspectives on evolutionary theory. Science and Public Policy, v. 18, n. 6, p. 353–361, 1991.
DOSI, G.; PAVITT, K.; SOETE, L. Technology and International Trade. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1990.
EVENSON, R. E.; KISLEV, Y. Agricultural Research and Productivity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1975.
FAGERBERG, J.; GODINHO, M. M. Innovation and catching-up. In: FAGERBERG, J.; MOWERY, D. C.; NELSON, R. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. p. 514–544.
FREEMAN, C. Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter, 1987.
FUGLIE, K.; WANG, S. L.; BALL, E. Productivity Growth in Agriculture: An International Perspective. Oxfordshire, UK: CAB International, 2012.
GALA, P. Complexidade econômica: uma nova perspectiva para entender a antiga questão da riqueza das nações. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto / Centro Internacional Celso Furtado de Políticas para o Desenvolvimento, 2017. 144 p.
GARDNER, B. L. American Agriculture in the Twentieth Century: How It Flourished and What It Cost. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.
GASQUES, J. G.; BASTOS, E. T.; VALDES, C.; BACCHI, M. R. P. Produtividade da agricultura brasileira: resultados para o Brasil e estados selecionados. Revista de Política Agrícola, v. 23, n. 3, p. 87–98, 2014.
GOLLIN, D.; LAGAKOS, D.; WAUGH, M. E. Agricultural productivity differences across countries. American Economic Review, v. 104, n. 5, p. 165–170, 2014.
THE GROWTH LAB AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY. The Atlas of Economic Complexity. Disponível em: http://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/. Acesso em: 14 jul. 2018.
HAUSMANN, R.; CHAUVIN, J. Moving to the adjacent possible: Discovering paths of export diversification in Rwanda. Center for International Development (CID) Faculty Working Paper, n. 294, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 2015.
HAUSMANN, R.; HIDALGO, C.; BUSTOS, S.; COSCIA, M.; CHUNG, S.; JIMENEZ, J.; SIMOES, A.; YILDIRIM, M. The Atlas of Economic Complexity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.
HAYAMI, Y.; RUTTAN, V. W. Agricultural Development: An International Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985.
HIDALGO, C. A.; HAUSMANN, R. The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 106, n. 26, p. 10570–10575, 2009.
HIDALGO, C. A.; KLINGER, B.; BARABÁSI, A. L.; HAUSMANN, R. The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, v. 317, n. 5837, p. 482–487, 2007.
HUERGO, H. La Segunda Revolución de las Pampas, una revolución tecnológica. Clarín Rural, Buenos Aires, 8 abr. 2005.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA (IBGE). With a record rise in agriculture, GDP closes 2023 at 2.9%. Agência de Notícias IBGE. Disponível em: https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/en/agencia-news/2184-news-agency/news/39314-with-a-record-rise-in-agriculture-gdp-closes-2023-at-2-9. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2025.
INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA (IBGE). Sistema de Contas Nacionais Trimestrais. Disponível em: https://www.ibge.gov.br. Acesso em: 14 jun. 2018.
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE (IFPRI). Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI). Brazil Agricultural R&D Indicators Factsheet. Disponível em: https://www.asti.cgiar.org/pdf/factsheets/Brazil-Factsheet.pdf. Acesso em: 14 abr. 2018.
LAGAKOS, D.; WAUGH, M. E. Selection, agriculture and cross-country productivity differences. American Economic Review, v. 103, n. 2, p. 948–980, 2013.
LUNDVALL, B. A. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter, 1992.
MUHAMMAD, A.; SEALE, J. L.; MEADE, B.; REGMI, A. International evidence on food consumption patterns: An update using 2005 international comparison program data. USDA-ERS Technical Bulletin, n. TB-1929, U.S. Govt Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2011.
NELSON, R. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
NELSON, R. R.; WINTER, S. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
PÉREZ, C. Una visión para América Latina: Dinamismo tecnológico e inclusión social mediante una estrategia basada en los recursos naturales. Revista Econômica, v. 14, n. 2, p. 11-54, 2012.
POSSAS, M. L.; SALLES-FILHO, S.; SILVEIRA, J. M. An evolutionary approach to technological innovation in agriculture: Some preliminary remarks. Research Policy, v. 25, n. 6, p. 933–945, 1996.
RADA, N. Assessing Brazil’s Cerrado agricultural miracle. Food Policy, v. 38, p. 146–155, 2013.
RADA, N.; VALDES, C. Policy, technology, and efficiency of Brazilian agriculture. USDA-ERS Economic Research Report, n. 137, U.S. Govt Printing Office, Washington DC, 2012.
KATTEL, R.; REINERT, E. S. Modernizing Russia: Round III. Russia and the other BRIC countries: forging ahead, catching up or falling behind. Tallinn University of Technology. Disponível em: http://hum.ttu.ee/wp/paper32.pdf. Acesso em: 14 set. 2019.
SILVEIRA, J. D. Agricultura brasileira: o papel da inovação tecnológica. In: O mundo rural no Brasil do século 21. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2014. p. 373-394.
WIEBE, K.; SOULE, M.; NARROD, C.; BRENEMAN, V. Resource quality and agricultural productivity: A multi-country comparison. In: WIEBE, K. (Ed.). Land Quality, Agricultural Productivity, and Food Security: Biophysical Processes and Economic Choices at Local, Regional, and Global Levels. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003.
WORLD BANK. World Development Indicators. Time series of value added per worker in agriculture. Disponível em: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.AGR.EMPL.KD. Acesso em: 28 jul. 2018.
