Conceptual framework of Brazilian universities in the context of the quadruple helix.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26767/coloquio.222025.3655Abstract
The research proposes a conceptual framework that serves as a guiding instrument for university-society relations. The research focused on federal universities (UFs) in the North and Northeast regions of Brazil, specifically those with a Technology Innovation Nucleus (NIT) and an active Institutional Innovation Policy. Through a qualitative multiple case study approach, interviews were conducted with 22 participants, including 12 NIT managers and 10 university rectors. Key findings include: (i) university-society relationships are inconsistent; (ii) there is a significant gap in communication between universities and society; (iii) a culture of entrepreneurship and innovation is not yet institutionalized; (iv) universities rely heavily on public funding for innovation; (v) there are challenges in technology transfer; and (vi) they partially fulfill the third mission. The study concludes that it is essential to promote closer ties between universities and societal actors through entrepreneurial strategies that enhance innovative solutions, thereby effectively addressing real-world problems and improving socioeconomic conditions.
References
ANALYTICS, CLARIVATE. Research in Brazil: a report for CAPES by Clarivate Analytics. 2018. Acesso em, 2024.
ARNKIL, Robert et al. Exploring quadruple helix outlining user-oriented innovation models. In: Título do livro. Local: Editora, 2010.
AUDY, Jorge. A inovação, o desenvolvimento e o papel da Universidade. Estudos Avançados, São Paulo, v. 31, n. 89, p. 75-87, 2017.
BÓTÁNÉ HORVÁTH, Noémi; KATONÁNÉ KOVÁCS, Judit; SZŐKE, Szilvia. Building an entrepreneurial environment in rural regions: a possible way to develop human and social capital. Studies in Agricultural Economics, v. 117, n. 1, p. 20-26, 2015.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.243, de 11 de janeiro de 2016. Código de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Poder Executivo, Brasília, DF, 12 jan. 2016. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2015-2018/2016/Lei/L13243.htm#art2. Acesso em: 5 maio 2019.
CAI, Yuzhuo; LATTU, Annina. Triple helix or quadruple helix: which model of innovation to choose for empirical studies? Minerva, v. 60, n. 2, p. 257-280, 2022.
CARAYANNIS, E. G.; GRIGOROUDIS, E. Quadruple Innovation Helix and Smart Specialization: Knowledge Production and National Competitiveness. Foresight and STI Governance, v. 10, n. 1, p. 31-42, 2016.
CARAYANNIS, Elias G.; CAMPBELL, David FJ. “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, v. 46, n. 3-4, p. 201-234, 2009.
ETZKOWITZ, H.; ZHOU, C. The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 2ª ed. London: Routledge, 2017.
ETZKOWITZ, Henry. The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, v. 1, n. 1, p. 64-77, 2004.
FERREIRA, Maria Carolina Zanini; TEIXEIRA, Clarissa Stefani. Núcleo de inovação tecnológica: Alinhamento conceitual. Florianópolis: Perse, 2016. 17 p.
GARCÍA-TERÁN, Jessica; SKOGLUND, Annika. A processual approach for the quadruple helix model: The case of a regional project in Uppsala. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, v. 10, p. 1272-1296, 2019.
KOLEHMAINEN, Jari et al. Quadruple helix, innovation and the knowledge-based development: Lessons from remote, rural and less-favoured regions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, v. 7, p. 23-42, 2016.
KON, Anita. Ecossistemas de inovação: a natureza da inovação em serviços. Revista de Administração, Contabilidade e Economia da Fundace, v. 7, n. 1, 2016.
LEYDESDORFF, Loet; LAWTON SMITH, Helen. Triple, quadruple, and higher-order helices: historical phenomena and (neo-) evolutionary models. Triple Helix, v. 9, n. 1, p. 6-31, 2022.
MATOS, G. P.; VEIGA, M.; TEIXEIRA, C. O papel dos atores no ecossistema de inovação do Sapiens Parque. In: II CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL DE DESEMPENHO DO SETOR PÚBLICO - CIDESP, 27-29 ago. 2018, Florianópolis. Anais […]. Florianópolis: CIDESP, 2018.
MAZZUCATO, M. O Estado Empreendedor: Desmascarando o Mito do Setor Público vs. Setor Privado. São Paulo: Portfolio Penguin, 2018.
MILLER, Kristel et al. Knowledge transfer in university quadruple helix ecosystems: an absorptive capacity perspective. R&D Management, v. 46, n. 2, p. 383-399, 2016.
MILLER, Kristel; McADAM, Rodney; McADAM, Maura. A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: toward a research agenda. R&D Management, v. 48, n. 1, p. 7-24, 2018.
MINEIRO, A. A. C.; CASTRO, C. C.; AMARAL, M. Quem são os atores da hélice quádrupla e quíntupla? Casos múltiplos em parques científicos e tecnológicos consolidados. Anais… XXII Seminários de Administração, SemeAd, São Paulo-SP, 2019.
MINEIRO, A. A. C.; SOUZA, T. A.; CASTRO, C. C. A Operacionalização das Hélices Quádrupla e Quíntupla a partir de uma Meta-Síntese. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DA ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO E PESQUISA EM ADMINISTRAÇÃO, 2018, Anais […]. 2018.
MINEIRO, Andréa Aparecida da Costa; CASTRO, Cleber Carvalho de. A Hélice Quádrupla e sua relação com a visão de futuro dos Parques Científicos e Tecnológicos consolidados no Brasil. Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação, v. 6, n. 2, p. 71-89, 2020.
MINISTÉRIO DA EDUCAÇÃO (MEC). Geocapes. Brasília, DF: Autor, 2020.
MORGAN, K.; COOKE, P.; ASHEIM, B. Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governances in a Globalized World. London: Routledge, 2018.
MULYANINGSIH, Hendrati Dwi. Enhancing innovation in quadruple helix perspective: The case of the business incubators in Indonesia. International Business Management, v. 9, n. 4, p. 367-371, 2015.
NORDBERG, Kenneth; NORDBERG, Kenneth. Enabling regional growth in peripheral non-university regions: The impact of a quadruple helix intermediate organisation. In: Revolutionizing Economic and Democratic Systems: Reinventing the Third Way. [S.l.: s.n.], 2017. p. 185-217.
OCDE. A Guiding Framework for Entrepreneurial Universities. 2012.
OLIVEIRA, Álvaro; CAMPOLARGO, Margarida. From smart cities to human smart cities. In: 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2015.
PERIKANGAS, Sofi et al. A Human-Centric Co-creation Platform for Solving Wicked Social Challenges. In: Social Innovation in Higher Education. [S.l.: s.n.], 2022. p. 227.
RAUEN, Cristiane Vianna. O novo marco legal da inovação no Brasil: o que muda na relação ICT-Empresa? 2016.
SANTOS, Suely Xavier dos et al. O papel estratégico dos NITs na política de inovação das instituições de ensino superior do Rio Grande do Norte e da Paraíba. Gestão e Sociedade, v. 14, n. 38, 2020.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper, 1942.
VALACKIENĖ, Asta; NAGAJ, Rafał. Shared taxonomy for the implementation of responsible innovation approach in industrial ecosystems. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 17, p. 9901, 2021.
VARGAS, Marcelo; SHIMA, Walter Tadahiro. Relação universidade-firma de móveis na indústria de Arapongas. COLÓQUIO-Revista do Desenvolvimento Regional, v. 21, n. 1-jan.-mar., p. 326-344, 2024.
YIN, Robert K. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2015.
